The American judicial system finds itself under siege as threats loom and the identities of certain jurors are exposed across countless social media platforms. What's even more alarming is that these individuals are now being targeted with recommendations that encourage harassment and even resort to the use of racial slurs.

The Fulton County Sheriff's Office said on Thursday that It has come to their attention that certain grand jurors, who patriotically performed their civic responsibilities honorably cast their votes this week to indict former President Donald J. Trump and 18 other individuals, are now facing a disconcerting wave of internet threats. These threats, originating from unknown sources, are believed to be aimed at those who played a pivotal role in the indictment, accusing them of conspiring to overturn the results of Georgia's consequential 2020 election. In light of these distressing circumstances, the Fulton County Sheriff's Office has taken it upon itself to thoroughly investigate this matter and ensure the safety and well-being of the grand jurors involved. The allegations levied against former President Trump and his co-conspirators revolve around a concerted effort to exert influence over the outcome of the state's highly consequential presidential election.

In accordance with the customary legal practice observed in the state of Georgia, the identities of the jurors have been duly revealed at an early stage within the extensive 98-page indictment. The distinctive nature of Georgia's judicial system sets it apart from both its counterparts in other states and the federal government.

Now, the faces of some of those jurors, as well as their social media accounts, probable residences, and phone numbers, and in some cases, the recommendation that they should be harassed, have been circulated on internet sites; however, as of Thursday, it was unclear if anybody had followed through on those suggestions and harassed the jurors in question.

Subscribe 100% Free to Wall Street Rebel.com and receive access to investment tools worth $17,500!

In a statement, the county's sheriff's office stated that it was aware of internet threats made against grand jurors and that it was collaborating with other law enforcement agencies to determine where the threats originated. It did not respond to questions on whether or not any jurors had complained of being harassed.

Threats have also been made in response to other legal actions against Mr. Trump. Tanya S. Chutkan is the judge in Washington presiding over the federal election interference case being brought against the former president. This month, a woman from Texas was accused of threatening to assassinate Chutkan.

The jury members in the Georgia case came from throughout Fulton County, where the district attorney, Fani T. Willis, spent the last two and a half years investigating the activities taken by Mr. Trump and his friends in the wake of the 2020 election. She presented evidence to the jury on Monday. For an indictment to be handed down, there needed to be support from twelve of the panel's 23 members.

As soon as the indictment was made public late on Monday night, users on social media immediately started questioning the identity of the jurors and disclosing information about their personal lives.

One person commented on Wednesday on Facebook, "I thought it only fair to share a few names from that grand jury," including probable residences and phone numbers for some jurors. The user included a list of names from the grand jury. "I will continue to post the other jurors as I find them," said the jury's foreperson. (A spokeswoman for Meta, the company that owns Facebook and oversees its operations, said in an email that site moderators subsequently deleted the post.)

On Truth Social, the social media network launched by Mr. Trump — who has lashed out at prosecutors, judges, and private individuals who have sued him — many users shared the names. Mr. Trump has himself lashed out at prosecutors, judges, and private citizens who have sued him. In one answer to a list of several jurors, a user asked other users to "make sure they can't walk down the street" and to "make sure they become notorious" for their actions.

Other remarks that contained threats of violence against the jurors were posted on one web board, and Media Matters, a leftist group that monitors conservative media companies, gathered these messages and termed the list of the jurors' names and addresses a "hit list." Media Matters monitors these organizations.

Subscribe 100% Free to Wall Street Rebel.com and receive access to investment tools worth $17,500!

The New York Times was able to see the messages posted on over a dozen different channels of the messaging service Telegram, where the information on the jurors was being exchanged. Accusations were made on several media channels about the racial or religious origin of the jurors based on their names or views. No evidence supported these accusations. A number of individuals posted tweets that seemed to be written by a grand juror who had historically favored Democrats.

According to a criminologist and lawyer at the University of California, Irvine, named Jon B. Gould, the state of Georgia is quite rare in that it makes the identities of grand jurors public. According to him, this raises the risk of them being threatened or harassed due to the judgments they make, particularly in situations involving criminal gangs and organized crime.

According to Diane Peress, a former state and federal prosecutor who now teaches at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, prosecutors in both the New York State and the federal systems made significant efforts to conceal the identities of grand jurors. During the proceedings of the grand jury in the state of New York, for instance, the jurors are often solely referred to by their assigned numbers.

According to Michael Mears, a professor at John Marshall Law School in Atlanta, one of the purposes of the rule in Georgia that requires the release of the jurors' names is to provide defense attorneys with a small window into the proceedings. This allows defense attorneys to check, for example, whether any of the jurors should have been excluded because they were previously convicted of a felony or resided outside the county.

In every other respect, the legal proceedings in Georgia are more shrouded in secrecy than those in New York, the other state jurisdiction in which Mr. Trump has been charged with crimes. The state of New York maintains a record of the proceedings and testimony of grand juries, which is then provided to the defense and may be utilized during the trial.

According to Mr. Mears, however, records are not retained in Georgia, and a transcript is not prepared of grand jury proceedings, making it exceedingly difficult to contest the grand jury's judgment.

Subscribe 100% Free to Wall Street Rebel.com and receive access to investment tools worth $17,500!

Trump Supporters ENDANGER LIVES of Georgia Grand Jury - Post Names & Addresses Online!!!