=======================================================
RAPORT EXPERIMENT: COMUNICARE CUANTICA
Simulator utilizat: AerSimulator cu zgomot T1/T2
  T1(q0)=12.0µs  T2(q0)=12.0µs
  T1(q1)=15.0µs  T2(q1)=12.0µs
Numar de masuratori (shots): 2048
Delay parametrizat pentru Bob: 120 microsecunde
=======================================================

1. DATE BRUTE (Format: 'Qubit_Bob Qubit_Alice' : Numar_Aparitii)
-------------------------------------------------------
Cazul 0 (Alice a masurat calea - PASTREAZA): {'00': 1020, '01': 1028, '10': 0, '11': 0}
Cazul 1 (Alice a sters calea - H inainte):   {'00': 538, '01': 520, '10': 496, '11': 494}

2. ANALIZA STATISTICA A LUI BOB
-------------------------------------------------------
In CAZUL 0 (Alice pastreaza informatia):
  - Bob a masurat '0' de 2048 ori (100.00%)
  - Bob a masurat '1' de 0 ori (0.00%)

In CAZUL 1 (Alice sterge informatia):
  - Bob a masurat '0' de 1058 ori (51.66%)
  - Bob a masurat '1' de 990 ori (48.34%)

3. INTERPRETARE TEORETICA
-------------------------------------------------------
In simularea IDEALA (zero zgomot):
  - Ambele cazuri produc ~50/50 pentru Bob.
  - Diferenta intre cazuri e INVIZIBILA fara canalul clasic al Alicei.
  - Aceasta confirma Teorema No-Signalling (no-communication theorem).
  - Anomalia observata pe hardware IBM (71% vs 50%) a fost cauzata
    exclusiv de decohenta T1 (relaxare termica) in cei 120 µs de delay.

4. CONCLUZIE EXPERIMENTALA AUTOMATA
-------------------------------------------------------
Mesaj generat:
De cercetat ce se intampla!